Monthly Archives: April 2010

Plan Sponsor Resources

Those who work with Employee Benefit Plans represent a specialized niche that has unique regulations, deadlines, and responsibilities.  Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern CPAs would like this blog to be a resource for plan sponsors and administrators who are looking for news related to employee benefit plans, specifically the financial and fiduciary requirements related to the annual employee benefit plan audit.

Here are a few sites we think are “bookmark worthy” and should be your go-to resources for your daily dose of employee benefit information:

AICPA’s Plan Sponsor Resource Center

Department of Labor’s Selecting an Auditor

Employee Benefit News  

And of course, our blog

Test Your Financial Planning Knowledge

Retirement accounts and investments are on everyone’s mind these days – take the Financial Planning Knowledge IQ test from AP reporter Dave Carpenter to celebrate Financial Literacy Month.

“The days of counting on a company pension and Social Security to assure financial well-being in retirement are over.

Pensions are vanishing fast, and no one can guarantee that Social Security checks won’t be smaller in decades to come. That’s why it’s more important than ever to take charge of your own retirement planning.”

Click here for full story from Dave Carpenter.

Keeping a watchful eye on retirement plan auditors

We couldn’t agree more with this article from Employee Benefit News contributing writer By Frank Palmieri, Esq. - the plan sponsors should be in tune with the employee benefit audit process.  Read below for details on the audit and what you should be aware of.

Most HR/benefits professionals are familiar with the concept of training the trainers. The Department of Labor recently introduced an initiative that practitioners refer to as auditing the auditors.

Gunning for errors

Under this program, DOL is issuing letters to accounting firms who perform audits for qualified retirement plans, requesting copies of work papers and management letters, typically referred to as the SAS 112 Letter, which stands for Statement of Financial Account Standards No. 112, Employer’s Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.

Understanding the audit process and the DOL initiative is imperative to employers in making business decisions regarding qualified retirement plans.

Employers who maintain qualified retirement plans with more than 100 participants as of the beginning of any plan year are required to attach an accountant’s opinion to the annual Form 5500 filing. The audit is not a comprehensive compliance review of a retirement plan.

Rather, it primarily is a financial audit to detect any financial improprieties. Although most auditing firms generally test eligibility, contributions, vesting, distribution and loans as a part of an audit, such actions are performed on a sampling basis.

Accordingly, many accounting firms don’t identify administrative errors, such as use of the incorrect definitions of compensation for contributions or testing, even when they exist in qualified retirement plans. For an additional fee, most accounting firms and/or employee benefit consultants will also perform a more comprehensive compliance audit.

The purpose of these projects is to specifically detect errors in the administration of qualified retirement plans and to correct errors voluntarily or under the Voluntary Compliance Program as established under the Employee Plan Compliance Resolution System Program, as most recently announced in Revenue Procedure 2008-50, or the DOL Voluntary Fiduciary Program.

Audit results

The primary products from a retirement plan audit are the audited financial statements, accountant’s opinion and footnotes. In addition to the audit report, accounting firms also issue a letter to management under SAS 112.

This letter will highlight issues identified on audit. Auditors will categorize comments as control deficiencies, significant deficiencies or a material weakness, which is the most severe operational deficiency. For example, an accounting firm may note that it observed employees being improperly excluded from participation in a plan. This would be a significant deficiency.

On the other hand, an accounting firm may believe that the human resources, finance and legal departments should better communicate changes in plan design. This would simply be a recommendation to improve procedures in the future.

Under the DOL initiative, accounting firms are being subpoenaed to provide copies of all management letters to the DOL where any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses may have occurred.

Therefore, what may have been intended as confidential communications between an accounting firm and an employer will now be turned over the DOL. The DOL is undertaking this initiative based upon its investigative authority under Section 504(a)(i) of ERISA. If an accounting firm refuses to turn over records, the DOL will issue a subpoena to obtain such records.

The important issue for employers is to carefully review the draft letters to management and to negotiate the classification of any deficiency. By explaining the reason certain errors have occurred, and how they have already been corrected, an accounting firm may be willing to downgrade an error from a significant deficiency to a control deficiency.

Paying attention

More importantly, if employers understand that management letters will be disclosed to the DOL, employers will be encouraged to consider the IRS and DOL programs to correct administrative errors.

In general, under the voluntary compliance program, insignificant errors may be fixed at any point in time. Significant errors may be corrected by the end of the second plan year following the year in which the error occurs. Thus, an error made in January 2009 can be corrected by Dec. 31, 2011, for a calendar year plan without any IRS filing.

Significant errors that are more than two years old may be corrected under the voluntary compliance program by filing an application with the IRS and paying the applicable user fee. User fees have dropped significantly from the original amnesty programs introduced by the IRS.

For small employers with between 51 and 100 participants, administrative errors may be fixed for a fee of $2,500. Larger employers with over 10,000 participants may pay a fee of $25,000 to fix errors.

As the audit season begins for the 2009 plan years, employers should carefully consider footnote disclosures in financial statements and management letters received from accounting firms. If necessary, voluntary compliance program applications may be filed with the IRS. For fiduciary breaches, employers may also consider the voluntary fiduciary program as sponsored by the DOL.

Bottom line: Failure to act when errors have already been communicated to the DOL is like playing cards with an open hand. No bluffing will work and all bets are off.

Accounting terms explained

Here is a summary of accounting terms under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 112, Employer’s Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.

Control deficiency: When the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.

Significant deficiency: A deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the plan’s financial reporting.

Material weakness: A deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the plan’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Test Your Knowledge of Mutual Funds

A quiz from Mark Jewell of the Associated Press on mutual funds that has been picked up this month in several papers- check it out below or click here:

Mutual funds are a cornerstone of retirement planning. Yet they’re widely misunderstood and investing ignorance can really cost you. Do you know the difference between an expense ratio and a turnover ratio? What about an open-end fund versus a closed-end? Try this quiz, and check out the answers at bottom:

1. What percentage of households own mutual funds?

(a) 10 percent; (b) 27 percent; (c) 43 percent

2. When was the key law governing mutual fund operations adopted?

(a) 1929; (b) 1933; (c) 1934; (d) 1940

3. How many mutual funds are there in the U.S.?

(a) Nearly 1,000; (b) Nearly 4,000; (c) Nearly 8,000

4. What is a mutual fund’s expense ratio?

(a) The sales fee paid when you invest in a fund, expressed as a percentage of how much you invest;

(b) The total fees charged to manage the fund and cover ongoing expenses, expressed as a percentage of the fund’s assets;

(c) The fee you pay to a broker who sells you the fund

5. What’s a fund’s turnover ratio?

(a) A measure of how often a fund’s manager is replaced; (b) How frequently the fund trades stocks or other investments in and out of its portfolio; (c) How often the fund gets new investors and loses existing clients

6. Traditional open-end mutual funds can issue as many or as few shares as investors demand, with potentially no limits on the number of investors in the fund, or the amount of money it can hold.

(a) True; (b) False

7. Common stock funds will always provide investors with higher returns than bond mutual funds.

(a) True; (b) False

8. Mutual funds are prohibited from using investing strategies that unregulated hedge funds can employ.

(a) True; (b) False

9. You can lose money in an absolute return mutual fund.

(a) True; (b) False

10. Fund managers’ interests should be aligned with their investors. But what percentage of managers don’t invest in their funds – in other words, how many don’t “eat their own cooking”?

(a) 10 percent; (b) 35 percent; (c) More than 50 percent

ANSWERS:

1. (c) A survey by the Investment Company Institute, a fund industry organization, found 43 percent of U.S. households owned mutual funds in 2009, down from 45 percent a year earlier. Those households represent some 90 million individual fund shareholders.

2. (d) The main law is the Investment Company Act of 1940, although mutual funds also are subject to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

3. (c) The Investment Company Institute counted 7,677 funds in February, holding nearly $11 trillion. Two common types are stock funds, numbering about 4,900; and taxable bond funds, with more than 1,800.

4. (b) A fund’s expense ratio covers the fund company’s costs before distributing earnings to investors. This amount can have a much bigger impact than any upfront sales costs – also known as loads, or commissions – since expenses can eat into returns for years to come.

5. (b) The turnover ratio measures the percentage of a fund’s holdings that have been replaced over the past year. If the manager makes smart trades, a higher ratio can boost short-term returns. But a fund with high turnover increases fund trading costs, and can boost an investor’s tax bill.

6. (a) True. Traditional open-end mutual funds are structured so that they can add investors and assets. Far less common are closed-end funds, where a fund company decides up front how many fund shares will be issued, limiting the number of investors. Those initial investors can later trade shares to others.

7. (a) False. While it’s true that in the long run stocks generally outperform bonds, there are times where the opposite is true. As we’ve seen during the recession, the stock market can post dramatic losses while bond investors are generally protected. For example, over the last decade, the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index lost an average 0.95 percent per year. Meanwhile, a broad taxable bond index, the Barclays Capital Aggregate, returned a positive 6.3 percent per year.

8. (b) False. Regulations limit how much mutual funds can borrow to invest in derivatives, such as futures and options. But, depending on the guidelines in its prospectus, a fund can adopt some of the same strategies that hedge funds use, including short-selling.

9. (b) True. These funds generally employ the same strategies as many hedge funds to smooth out returns in good times and bad. But you can still lose money, even if you’ll fare better than most investors in a downturn. The same goes for stable value funds.

10. (c) A Morningstar study found a majority of funds did not count managers among their shareholders. For example, 59 percent of foreign stock funds had no manager ownership in the fund. The figure was 65 percent for taxable-bond funds, 70 percent for balanced funds owning stocks and bonds, and 78 percent for municipal bond funds. The exception was U.S. stock funds, where just 46 percent of funds had no manager ownership.

SCORING SYSTEM:

0-3: It’s time to take Mutual Funds 101.

4-5: You’re progressing, but how about picking up a few mutual fund books or checking out some Web sites?

6-7: Pretty good, but your knowledge gaps could put you at risk of getting into the wrong fund.

8-9: Very good, your fund acumen is admirable.

10: Perfect! You have a solid foundation to build on.

Tough times are no excuse for ERISA shortcuts

Excerpts from an article by By Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, Esq. posted in Employee Benefits News.

Business owners and leaders who are facing financial challenges should consider a mounting series of recent court orders and federal prosecutions as strong reminders of the personal risk they may face for mismanaging employee benefit programs governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

The mishandling of employee benefit obligations by financially distressed employers during the ongoing economic downturn is fueling an increase in enforcement actions by the Employee Benefit Security Administration against the companies and their officers or directors for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties or other mishandling of medical, 401(k) and pension benefit programs.

Aggressive investigation

EBSA’s enforcement activities during 2009 continue to highlight the longstanding and ongoing policy of aggressive investigation and enforcement of alleged misconduct by companies, company officials,and service providers with the maintenance, administration and funding of ERISA-regulated employee benefit plans.

A review of the agency’s enforcement record makes clear that if regulators perceive that a plan sponsor or its management fails to take appropriate steps to protect plan participants, EBSA will aggressively pursue enforcement regardless of the size of the plan sponsor or its plan, or the business hardships that the plan sponsor may be facing.

EBSA reports enforcing $1.3 billion in recoveries related to pension, 401(k), health and other benefits during fiscal year 2009. The government has filed numerous lawsuits to compel distressed or bankrupt companies and/or members of their management to pay restitution or other damages for alleged breaches of ERISA fiduciary duties, to appoint independent fiduciaries, or both.

Click here to read the full article.

Happy National Employee Benefits Day!

Tomorrow, April 6th, is National Employee Benefits Day – this day is set aside to acknowledges trustees, administrators, corporate benefits practitioners and professional advisors for your dedication to providing quality benefits and the important role you play in their colleagues’ well-being.

This year National Employee Benefits Day has a special focus on Workplace Wellness. Use this day to evaluate your wellness at work and reach out to your plan participants with suggestions on living a healthier lifestyle—both at work and at home.

You can even send a Employee Benefits Day card through the IFEBP – very cool!